Robert F. Kennedy Jr. :
другие произведения.
A Letter 10 Liberals
Самиздат:
[
Регистрация
] [
Найти
] [
Рейтинги
] [
Обсуждения
] [
Новинки
] [
Обзоры
] [
Помощь
|
Техвопросы
]
Ссылки:
Школа кожевенного мастерства: сумки, ремни своими руками
Оставить комментарий
© Copyright
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Размещен: 30/06/2023, изменен: 30/06/2023. 287k.
Статистика.
Роман
:
Политика
Скачать
FB2
Ваша оценка:
не читать
очень плохо
плохо
посредственно
терпимо
не читал
нормально
хорошая книга
отличная книга
великолепно
шедевр
Skip to main content
Upload
Sign up | Log in
Books
Video
Audio
Software
Images
Sign up for free
Log in
Search metadata
Search text contents
Search TV news captions
Search radio transcripts
Search archived web sites
Advanced Search
About Blog Projects Help Donate
Contact Jobs Volunteer People
Full text of "A Letter To Liberals From Robert F Kennedy Jr"
See other formats
KKK KKK KKK KKK KKK KKK KKK KKK KKK
A LETTER
10 LIBERALS
from
ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.
Censorship and COVID:
An Attack on Science and
American Ideals
Children’s £)
Health Defenses?
CONTENTS
Author's Note..
A Challenge to Debate.....s.ssssrssssessossisssesssossssósisoseisosessossssssessossisssessssss 1
An Incongruous Liberal Allergy to Debate............ssssessssseseeseeeseees 3
1) Did COVID Vaccines Really Save Millions and End the Pandemic? ............-...-055 4
2) Why Were the Lowest COVID Death Rates in Countries and States That Relied on
Therapeutic Drugs like lvermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, and in Countries with the
LOWEST Vaccination Rates? voice isc vec eeoseinedamaisindie goaded a tauduisiee 16
3) Contrary to Official Promises, the Vaccines Did Not Prevent Infection or Transmission .. 17
4) In Contrast to Official Claims That They Are “Safe and Effective,” COVID Vaccines Appear
to Show “Negative Efficacy’—Making the Vaccinated More Susceptible to COVID..... 19
5) The Most Reliable Data Suggest That COVID Vaccines Do Not Lower Risk of Death
ald Hospitalization siscscncccsevon sens saa ve Faia Sbaa sea i TESA HOUT TOT 22
6) High Injury and Death Rates from COVID Vaccines May Cancel Out Even the Most
Exaggerated Claims of Vaccine Efficacy . “22
7) Mass Vaccination Has Preceded Global Rises in Excess Death . .25
8) Pharma and CDC Have Hidden the Damning Injury and Death Data Reports with
Cooperation from Leading Media Outlets Including the New York Times............4+ 27
9) Should Government Technocrats Be Partnering with Media and Social Media Titans
to Censor and Suppress the Questioning of Government Policies?..............0.55 27
10) Virtually All My Early Predictions Have Matured from “Conspiracy Theories” to
Piove Faas enen a Ea EE TIM Rees ae Meme eee Oram aa 29
11) Instead of a Public Health Response, Dr. Fauci's Militarized and Monetized COVID Policies
Proved to Be a Devastating War on the Poor, Children, and the Working Classes ..... 34
12) America Has Endured an Unprecedented Attack on Our Bill of Rights ............... 38
13) The Deprivation of Rights and Economic Demotion of the Middle Class Have
Spawned a Rebellion. Its Ideology Is Fluid and up for Grabs. ...........6.00e sevens 39
Does Hatred of Donald Trump and Support for Pfizer's Vaccine
Justify Savaging the Constitution?............ssscsesesseeseeseseseeseseeseee 40
Rather Than Hiding from Debate, Liberals Should Take Every
Opportunity to Defend Their Strategies Before Bipartisan
BUGIGNCES E E A ONTEAI 43
ENDNOTES. sanasana S 44
NoChildrensHealthDefense.org 2022 CENSORSHIP AND COVID: AN ATTACK ON SCIENCE AND AMERICAN IDEALS | ii
AUTHOR'S NOTE
[A]ttacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science... So if you are trying to get
at me as a public health official and scientist, you’re really attacking not only
Dr. Anthony Fauci, you are attacking science... You have to be asleep not to see
that.
—NIAID director Anthony Fauci, Meet the Press, June 9, 2021
fiat leader of the National Institute of Health (NIH)—the world’s principal funder
of scientific research—would make such a narcissistic and scientifically absurd
statement. The more serious concern is that the majority of my political party—the
Democrats—and the mainstream media generally accept Dr. Fauci’s assertion as
gospel. Journalists—even science journalists—act as if they believe that any pro-
nouncement by Dr. Anthony Fauci (or FDA, CDC, or WHO) should mark the end of
scientific inquiry. It is my hope that this short book will remind all Americans that
blind faith in authority is a feature of religion and autocracy, but not of science nor
democracy.
In what was arguably one of the most important speeches in American history,
President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned our citizenry precisely against this kind of
misplaced faith in federal scientific bureaucrats:
| is troubling enough that our country’s leading public health technocrat and the
The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will
persist. . .. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger
our liberties or democratic processes. In this revolution, research has
become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly.
A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of,
the Federal government. . . . The prospect of domination of the nation’s
scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of
money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded. We must . . . be alert
to the . . . danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a
scientific-technological elite.
This essay emerged from a congenial and ongoing conversation, during the
COVID pandemic, between myself and my longtime friend and former law partner,
John Morgan, a lifelong champion of the Democratic Party and liberal values.
I invited John—who reveres Anthony Fauci and accepts the scientific validity of
the government’s COVID countermeasures—to reengage his critical thinking skills
and to accept my challenge to science-based debate, which he did. I hope this little
book will encourage other liberal Democrats to do the same.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
No ChildrensHealthDefense.org, 2022 CENSORSHIP AND COVID: AN ATTACK ON SCIENCE AND AMERICAN IDEALS | iii
trom the |
G: K your baal (
-0V
En RRA NYa
pis RIGHT 4 for YC
A CHALLENGE TO DEBATE
My dear fellow Liberal,
ust before his death in 1642, Galileo
complained that the authors of
his 1615 censure were not just the
clergy—understandably fearful that
heliocentrism would subvert Church
cosmologies—but, oddly, his fellow
scientists, who universally refused to
look through his telescope.
I am an FDR/Kennedy liberal, but
my choice to openly question gov-
ernment policies for managing the
pandemic—under both Presidents
Biden and Trump—has made me
pariah, primarily in liberal circles.
Many traditional liberals—reacting
to the orchestrated fear and propa-
ganda—have embraced “Lockdown
Liberalism,” an ideology that departs
dramatically from the tenets of
No ChildrensHealthDefense.org, 2022
traditional liberalism. Like Galileo’s
colleagues, so many of today’s
“Lockdown Liberals” refuse to read
or debate the science that they believe
supports the government’s COVID
countermeasures. Instead, they place
their faith in the official orthodoxies
of famously corrupt pharmaceuti-
cal companies and their notoriously
captive federal agencies and expect
others to
dience is itself a kind of novel virus
that now infects the entire upper deck
of the Democratic Party. The core of
this ideology is a cult-like fealty to
COVID-19 countermeasures that are,
in fact, scientifically indefensible. By
necessity then, the acolytes of this
theology must be ferociously hos-
tile toward debate that might expose
o the same. This blind obe-
Like Galileo’s
colleagues, so many
of today’s “Lockdown
Liberals” refuse to
read or debate the
science that they
believe supports the
government’s COVID
countermeasures.
CENSORSHIP AND COVID: AN ATTACK ON SCIENCE AND AMERICAN IDEALS | 1
errors in government dogma and
must, like the Roman Inquisition that
extracted Galileo’s recantation under
threat of burning at the stake, merci-